|
<Back
| Home | Basics |
Departments | Get
Involved | Site Map | What's
New

Successful Breastfeeding
...And Successful Alternatives
By Sally Fallon and Mary G. Enig, PhD
Breastfeeding is best. Breast milk is nature's perfect food for babies.
Breast milk contains special substances that give the growing baby immunity
to infection and disease. Breastfeeding bonds a mother to her baby,
stimulates important hormonal activities in her body, helps her lose
weight after pregnancy and protects her against future breast cancer
and osteoporosis.
Breastfeeding is best. . . in a perfect world. But the world is not
perfect and self-evident statements are not always true. Breastfeeding
advocates argue that breast-fed children have lower mortality rates
and better levels of health than formulafed children. In third world
countries, where the cleanliness needed for safe bottle-feeding is lacking,
this is undoubtedly true. But a perusal of recent studies comparing
breastfed and formula-fed infants presents a real dilemma for breastfeeding
advocates because the research does not provide a clear case of benefit.
DISTURBING STUDIES
A study published in July, 2001, for example, found that breastfed
children in Japan had more asthma than bottle-fed infants.1
A European study found that breastfeeding was not related to iron status
in one-year-old children. Those with the best iron status were those
who received iron-fortified formula.2 A
Swedish study found that breast fed infants were just as likely to develop
childhood cancer compared to formula-fed babies.3
In fact, babies breastfed for one month or more had a higher risk of
non-Hodgkins' lymphoma, although this finding was based on low numbers
of cases. A study from Norway found that breastfeeding did not provide
protection against frequent ear infections.4
A report in Pediatric Clinics of North America noted that many
breastfed babies suffer from failure-to-thrive and dehydration.5
The author warned: "Those who enthusiastically promoted breastfeeding
for its many health benefits must confront the reality of breastfeeding
failure and implement necessary changes in medical education and support
services to foster successful outcomes in breastfed infants."
Only one study carried out during the past two years found a clear-cut
benefit for breastfeeding. Researchers at the Harvard Medical School
found that children who were breastfed we much less likely to be overweight
as adults.6
Studies on the relationship between breastfeeding and cognitive skills
are mixed.7 Some studies have shown that
breastfed infants are more intelligent while others show no difference.
Critics contend that better cognitive scores in breastfed infants are
due to the fact that mothers with higher levels of educational attainment
are more likely to breastfeed.
Formula manufacturers are quick to use the lackluster performance of
breastfed children as proof that formula is "just as good" as breast
milk. Breastfeeding advocates retort that the studies were designed
to give results that benefit the formula makers. Our interpretation
is the following: the diet of modern American women is so appalling,
and their preparation for successful breastfeeding so lacking, that
their breast milk provides no better nourishment for their infants than
factory-made formula.
DOES DIET MATTER?
"Breastfeeding mothers do not need to worry about their diets. As
long as they are getting enough calories, their milk will be fine."
This is the dogma of most of the groups promoting breastfeeding throughout
the world. "The message that diet has an influence on milk quality will
discourage mothers from breastfeeding," they say.
Typical advice to pregnant women is as follows: "Include fruits, vegetables,
grains, meat or meat alternative and lowfat milk products in your diet
every day. Avoid caffeinated beverages and alcohol." Lactating women
are advised to eat "vitamin-A rich foods" such as "carrots, spinach,
sweet potatoes and cantaloupe." Above all, say the "experts," don't
worry too much about what you eat. "Your diet does not have to be 'perfect'
to nourish your baby well."8
Lactation consultants cite one study that found no difference in levels
of several factors between "well-nourished" and "undernourished" mothers.
These factors were the immune-protecting compounds sIgA, lysozyme and
lactoferrin.9 We are tempted to ask how
researchers with such an abysmal knowledge of nutrition--promoting
lowfat milk as nutritious, meat alternatives as the equivalent of meat,
and vegetables as a source of vitamin A (which they are not)--how
such researchers could be trusted to know the difference between "well-nourished"
and "undernourished" mothers?
But even if there is little variation in certain immune factors as
claimed, there can be huge variations in other nutrients depending on
what the mother eats.
LONG-CHAIN FATTY ACIDS
Mother's milk contains long-chain polyunsaturated fatty acids (LCP)
that the baby needs for the development of its nervous system. These
special fats accumulate in the brain and retina. If they are absent
in the infant diet, the child is likely to suffer from learning disabilities
and reduced visual acuity.10 The most important
LCP's are arachidonic acid (AA) of the omega-6 family, docosahexaenoic
acid (DHA) of the omega-3 family and eicosapentaenoic acid (EPA), also
of the omega-3 family. (For more information on long-chain fatty acids,
see "Tripping Lightly down the
Prostaglandin Pathways.")
The LCP composition in the tissues of growing infants is largely determined
by the LCP content of the milk that the baby consumes. The recognition
that these LCPs are vital for the optimal development of the infant
has led to efforts to mandate their inclusion in commercial formula-as
is done in other countries, notably Japan. Formula manufacturers have
resisted because the fatty acids add considerably to the cost of making
the formula and also require special handling to prevent oxidation.
However, so compelling is the research that on July 16, 2001, the US
Food and Drug Administration approved the addition of two fatty acids
derived from blue-green algae to infant formulas.
What is less well known is that the levels of LCPs in human breast
milk greatly depend on the mother's diet. An important 1997 study compared
the fatty acid composition of breast milk of mothers in two Chinese
provinces with that of Canadian mothers.11
Mothers in the traditional province of Chongqing had higher levels of
milk fat than those from westernized Hong Kong, and higher levels of
AA, due to a special period of feeding for the first four weeks after
the birth of the baby during which Chongqing mothers consume up to ten
eggs per day and large amounts of chicken and pork. The diet of Hong
Kong mothers was much lower in fat and calories, but because of high
fish consumption, their levels of DHA were as high as those of Chongqing
mothers. But breast milk levels of AA and DHA in both provinces were
much higher than those of Canadian mothers.
The Chinese breast milk study proves that the levels of important fatty
acids in mother's milk are strongly influenced by the mother's diet.
For example, the content of erucic acid (a long-chain monounsaturated
fatty acid) increased in the milk of Chongqing mothers during the later
weeks of lactation, reflecting a dietary switch from animal fats to
rape seed oil. Levels of omega-6 linoleic acid were high in the milk
of Hong Kong mothers, reflecting their use of high-omega-6 vegetable
oils derived from corn and soy.
Ideal breast milk contains high levels of both saturated fats and LCPs.
This can be accomplished by consuming high levels of animal fats plus
eggs, cod liver oil and oily fish throughout the lactation period. Saturated
fats in mother's milk stimulate the immune system and work synergistically
with LCPs to maintain them in the tissues where they belong.12
Levels of fat in a mother's milk will decrease with each baby unless
she takes special care to consume high levels of nutrient-dense fats
between pregnancies and during each lactation.13
VITAMINS AND MINERALS
A recent study found that breast milk did not meet the minimum requirements
for many nutrients.14 Vitamin D was especially
low. A study in Nigeria found that calcium and potassium levels in human
milk varied by a factor of 2, magnesium and copper by a factor of 3,
chloride levels by a factor of 4, iron and selenium by almost 5, iodine
and sodium by almost 7, and zinc, which is vital to the nervous system,
by over 7.15 In other words, some mothers
had seven times more zinc in their milk than others.
Another survey found large variations in the levels of B vitamins.16
Vitamin B6 concentrates in breast milk and B6
requirements are increased in lactating women.17
More B6 is required if the woman is exercising--an important
reason for adequate rest during the nursing period. The same study found
that vitamin C ranged from 0 to 11.2 mg per 100 grams and vitamin A
from 15 to 226 IU.
Vitamin A is vital for the development of the infant. Vitamin A is
found only in animal fats. Mothers can convert some of the precursors
in fruits and vegetables into true vitamin A and these will then show
up in her milk, but adequate supplies can only be met with consumption
of animal foods rich in the true form of this nutrient.18
A 1992 study carried out in Indonesia found that mothers who received
vitamin-A supplementation had higher levels in their blood and milk
than those who received a placebo and the infants of the supplemented
group were less likely to be vitamin-A deficient.19
Deficiency was measured by the presence of conjunctivitis in the eyes.
Incidence of conjunctivitis fell in infants nursing from mothers taking
a vitamin-A supplement. The authors noted that vitamin-A status was
lowest in women who were thin and who had had many babies-a warning
not to lose weight too quickly after birth of a baby and to put sufficient
space between children so that vitamin-A stores can be rebuilt.
Adequate B12 is essential for the development of the infant.
One study found a B12 deficiency in a breastfed infant of
a strict vegetarian.20 Another found lower
levels of long-chain polyunsaturated fatty acids in the blood of babies
born to vegetarian women.21
While protein levels in human milk remain constant at about 11 percent
under various conditions, levels of fat and lactose-both essential for
the development of the nervous system-vary widely.22
Even the various anti-inflammatory and antibacterial compounds
in a mother's milk vary markedly according to her diet.23
TRANS FATS. . . AND OTHER BAD THINGS
Trans fats from partially hydrogenated vegetable oils are present
in margarine, shortening and many processed foods. The accumulated evidence
is that trans fats are bad news indeed. They interfere with many
enzymatic processes, cause reduced learning ability, disrupt the endocrine
system, and contribute to allergies, asthma and many other diseases.24
(However, small amounts of one form of trans fats naturally occurring
in butterfat are not harmful.)
If exposure to trans fats is bad for adults, it is even worse
for babies and children during their growing years. Formula makers know
better than to put trans fats into baby formula-yet human milk
will contain high levels of trans fats if the mother consumes
margarine, fried foods and commercial baked goods. The Chinese study
found that Canadians had 33 times more trans fats in their milk
than the traditional Chongqing mothers who did not consume processed
foods! Hong Kong mothers had four times more trans fats in their
milk than the Chongqing mothers, reflecting the inroads that processed
foods have made in westernized Hong Kong.
Many other bad things can end up in mother's milk, including pesticides,
mercury (from amalgam fillings), and high levels of phytoestrogens,
if the mother eats a lot of soy. (However, phytoestrogens in the milk
of mothers who eat a lot of soy is still about 3000 times less than
levels in soy-based formula.25)
One study discovered peanut proteins in mother's milk and warned that
lactating women who eat peanuts may cause peanut allergies in their
infants!26 Even mother's milk can cause
allergies.
MILK SUPPLY
According to La Leche League literature, insufficient milk supply is
rare. The problem, they say, is not a deficiency in the mammary gland,
but a "shared belief" among women or health workers "that insufficient
milk is a common phenomenon." Baby's frequent crying, they say, should
not be interpreted as a sign of insufficient or poor quality milk-even
though this is what a mother's instincts tell her. According to the
La Leche League handbook, "The word 'insufficient' is like the word
'inadequate'-once it has been directed at a mother it can never be retracted,
and her confidence in her body's ability to nurture and nourish at the
breast often plummets."
Yet ancient medical literature abounds in treatments for lactation
failure.27 Modern studies show that a mother's
milk supply can vary and that it is influenced by her diet. In 1981,
investigators in Gambia found that milk output diminished during the
five-month rainy season when food supplies were less, although there
was a greater fall-off among mothers nursing babies older than three
months.28 Milk was more plentiful during
the non-rainy season, and the growth of the infants was much more satisfactory.
First-time mothers were better able to maintain milk output than mothers
with multiple children. The researchers found no correlation between
milk supply and frequency of feeding. The main factor was the amount
of food available to the mother.
Concern about milk supply is not a modern phenomenon, inculcated by
evil formula manufacturers in order to sell more formula-although the
formula makers are indeed quick to exploit this concern. Most traditional
cultures use special foods or "galactogogues" in the belief that they
increase milk flow, ranging from powdered earthworms in India, to fish
soup in China and Japan, to a variety of special teas.29
Soup made from roosters is a galactogogue used in several areas of the
world. Weston Price recorded the practice of special feeding for pregnant
and lactating women. The foods given were animal foods rich in fat-soluble
vitamins and, in a few cases, soaked cereal gruels.30
Modern literature on breastfeeding dismisses the notion of galactogogues
as mere superstition, but future generations would be better served
if researchers devoted their efforts to determining which of them actually
worked.
Mothers from all societies and in all ages have naturally been concerned
about having enough milk for their infants. An 1885 votive painting
from Japan depicts a mother praying for an abundant milk supply for
her newborn infant.31 The adjoining painting
shows her prayer being answered, as milk flows from her breast to a
bowl. If adequate milk were automatic for all women, there would be
no need to offer prayers.
The percentage of mothers who begin by breastfeeding has not changed
over the past 20 years. A federal survey in 1995 found that 58 percent
of all women began breastfeeding, the same percentage as in the early
1980s. But almost 20 percent fewer mothers were still nursing after
three months than in the mid-1980s, and this in spite of the fact that
breastfeeding is now universally promoted as best for babies.32
A common reason for discontinuing breastfeeding in the US is, "I don't
have enough milk." Proof is given by baby's frequent crying or failure
to gain weight. We do a woman a great disservice by telling her that
it is "all in her head." In addition to adequate rest and help, she
needs special milk-inducing foods or, failing that, readily available
nutritious alternatives for her infant.
Consumption of trans fats lowers the overall fat content of
mother's milk.33 The poor quality of the
American diet, including very high levels of trans fatty acids
in commercial foods, is another reason why so many mothers abandon breastfeeding
after the first few weeks-they know better than any lactation consultant
that they do not have enough milk, or that their baby is not happy with
the quality of milk that it is getting from her breast.
WEB OF DECEPTION
"Oh what a tangled web we weave, when first we practice to deceive."
Behind the simple mantra "breastfeeding is best," gliding easily off
the tongues of lactation consultants, sales reps, government officials
and pediatricians, lurk several gross deceptions that usher millions
of women into the arms of the formula industry. First is the deception
that insufficient milk is rare. Yes, it is rare in a society of truly
healthy people but the western nations are not inhabited by truly healthy
people. The production and release of milk is governed by a complex
interaction of hormones, involving the hypothalamus, pituitary gland
and thyroid gland. There are plenty of places where it can go wrong
and given the high levels of thyroid and endocrine problems in western
women, it's a wonder that so many nurse successfully at all. Insufficient
milk supply is a problem more common than the medical profession wants
to admit, as many a valiant breastfeeding mother, starting off with
the best of intentions, has learned to her sorrow.
Second is the deception that "Almost all mothers can produce good milk,
even if their diet is not perfect." With this statement we turn our
backs on the accumulated wisdom of traditional people throughout the
globe, most of whom recognized that nursing mothers need special diets
to meet the special needs of the growing infant. As early as the 1940s,
Weston Price observed a decline in the quality of human breast milk,
as evidenced by the extensive dental problems he found in his breastfed
patients.34 The recent poor showing of
breastfed infants in comparison trials indicates that modern human milk
is not better-and possibly worse-than it was in Price's day.
The final deception is that babies should not be given homemade formula
made with cow or goat milk. Early books on infant feeding recognized
that milk from a cow (or goat, water buffalo, camel, sheep, reindeer
or llama) was the logical substitute. How wise these early writers seem
in comparison to our modern "experts":
Nature does not always confer upon a woman the important capacity
for nursing her baby, but the women who are able should do so. Every
pregnant woman should not only be impressed with the importance of
this duty on her part, but with the essential preparation for accomplishing
it. However, there are women who for some reason cannot perform this
natural function-for these, it is necessary to learn to take advantage
of the way now available to them to feed the infant artificially.
The logical substitute for human milk is cow's milk (or goat's milk).35
A mere fifty years ago, part of the preparation for women during pregnancy,
aside from a diet enriched by special animal foods, was the scouting
out of a cow that would be given the best of pasture and whose milk
would be available to the infant throughout its infancy. Today we know
that we should dilute the milk and add other whole foods, but even before
we knew these things, thousands of babies thrived on rich whole milk
from a variety of animals. Yet some of the strongest words in the medical
literature today are aimed at commercial formula's only competition-homemade
formula based on cow or goat milk.
Today the new mother who finds herself struggling with nursing, and
frantic at the frequent cries of her baby, is first told that she should
have more confidence. When she gives in to the inevitable and switches
to bottle feeding, she is told that formula made in factories is better
than milk produced by living animals. Another formula customer is born.
REALISTIC GOALS
Instead of engaging in wishful thinking, let's establish some realistic
goals. Top of the list would be to have virtually 100 percent of all
women nursing during the first month. The anti-immune factors in the
first few weeks of mother's milk are indeed unique to human milk, and
cannot be duplicated or provided in any formula. Ninety-eight percent
first-month nursing has been accomplished in Sweden by banning the distribution
of free formula samples in the maternity wards. Free samples should
be strictly forbidden-not just in the maternity wards, but through the
mail and in government programs like Women Infants and Children (WIC),
which distributes free formula to low income mothers.
Second, let's provide accurate nutrition advice to our young people
through sex education classes, childbirth classes and breastfeeding
support groups. Future parents need to know that the "average America
diet" is not likely to produce healthy children and not likely to give
a mother healthy milk.
Third, let's tell mothers who are struggling with poor milk supply
about the wonderful little device called the Lact-Aid, a little plastic
bag with a tube that lets a mother give her baby a supplement through
a tube laid over her breast while she continues to nurse. Sometimes
just a few weeks with the Lact-Aid is enough to get mother and baby
"over the hump" and increase milk supply for the newly relaxed and rested
mother. This device has been around since the early 1970s but breastfeeding
support groups have only recently endorsed it.
Finally, let's accept the inevitable. Breastfeeding for several months
should always be encouraged, but in today's society it is not a luxury
available to many. The need to return to work, problems with milk supply,
unsatisfactory progress of the infant-these are compelling reasons for
mothers to turn to formula feeding (although every effort should be
made to allow breastfeeding in the workplace). But mothers need to know
that formula made with good quality milk and other whole foods is vastly
superior to factory-made formula.
Above all, let's keep in mind the ultimate goal. The goal is healthy
children-not breastfeeding for the sake of breastfeeding and not convenience
feeding with store-bought foods-but healthy children. It is a goal that
requires wisdom, dedication, patience, hard work and mutual support
among breastfeeding and non-breastfeeding mothers. Above all, it requires
knowledge, not deception, and there is no better place to start than
with the teachings of Dr. Weston A. Price.
Note: The Lact-Aid system can be ordered from (423) 744-9090.
Visit their website at www.lact-aid.com.
REFERENCES
- Y Takemura and others. Relaton between Breastfeeding
and the Prevalence of Asthma: The Tokorozawa Childhood Asthma and
Pollinosis Study. American Journal of Epidemiology. July 2001;154(2):11509.
- C Male and others. Prevalence of iron deficiency
in 12-mo-old infants from 11 European areas and influence of dietary
factors on iron status (Euro-growth study). Acta Paediatrics.
May 2001;90(5):492-8.
- I Hardell and A C Dreifaldt. Breastfeeding duration
and the risk of malignant diseases in childhood in Sweden. European
Journal of Clinical Nutrition. March 2001;55(3):179-85.
- K W Wefring and others. Nasal congestion and earache
- upper respiratory tract infections in 4-year-old children. Tidsskr
Nor Laegeforen. April 30, 2001;121(11):1329-32.
- M R Neifert. Prevention of breastfeeding tragedies.
Pediatric Clinics of North America. April 2001;48(2):273-97.
- M W Gillman and others. Risk of overweight among
adolescents who were breastfed as infants. Journal of the American
Medical Association. May 16, 2001;285(19):2461-7.
- M C Temboury and others. Influence of breastfeeding
on the infant's intellectual development. Journal of Pediatric
Gastroenterology and Nutrition. Jan 1994;18(1):32-36; N K Angelsen
and others. Breast feeding and cognitive development at age 1 and
5 years. Archives of Diseases of Children. September 2001;85(3):183-188;
C Agostini and others. Breastfeeding duration, milk fat composition
and developmental indices at 1 year of life among breastfed infants.
Prostaglandins, Leukotrines and Essential Fatty Acids. February
2001;64(2):105-109.
- Nutrition During Pregnancy and Lactation,
Subcommittee for a Clinical Application Guide, Committee on Nutritional
Status During Pregnancy and Lactation, Food and Nutrition Board, Insititute
of Medicine, National Academy of Sciences, Washington, DC 1992
- Letter from Dawn Pomponio, RN Campbell River, BC,
Canada.
- B Koletzko and others. Long chain polyunsaturated
fatty acids (LC-PUFA) and perinatal development. Acta Paediatrics.
April 2001;90(4):460-4.
- Z Y Chen and others. Breast Milk Fatty Acid Composition:
A comparative Study Between Hong Kong and Chongqing Chinese. Lipids.1997;32(10):1061-1067.
- M L Garg and others. Federation of American
Societies for Experimental Biology (FASEB) Journal, 1988, 2:4:A852;
R M Oliart Ros and others. Meeting Abstracts. American Oil Chemists
Society Proceedings.May 1998, 7, Chicago, IL.
- R G Jensen. Lipids in Human Milk. Lipids.
December 1999;34(12):1243-1271.
- F R Greer. Do breastfed infants need supplemental
vitamins? Pediatric Clinics of North America. April 2001;48(2):415-23.
- F A Balogun and others. A Comparative Study of
Elemental Composition of Human Breast Milk and Infant Milk Substututes.
Biological Trace Element Research, G N Schrauzer, ed. Humana
Press, Inc. 1994, pages 471-479.
- V S Packard. Human Milk and Infant Formula.
Academic Press, New York, NY, 1982.
- C A Lovelady and others. Effect of energy restriction
and exercise on vitamin B-6 status of women during lactation. Medical
Science, Sports and Exercise. April 2001;33(4):512-8.
- S Fallon and M G Enig, PhD. Vitamin
A Vagary.
- R J Stoltzfus. Vitamin A and Lactation in Indonesian
Women. Ann Arbor, MI 1992.
- Vitamin B12 Deficiency in the Breastfed
Infant of a Strict Vegetarian. Nutrition Reviews. May 1979;37(5):142-144.
- S Reddy and others. The influence of maternal
vegetarian diet on essential fatty acid status of the newborn. European
Journal of Clinical Nutrition. May, 1994;48(5)358-368
- L J Filer. Relationship of nutrition to lactation
and newborn development. Nutritional impacts on women: throughout
life with emphasis on reproduction. K S Moghissi and T N Evans,
Eds. Harper and Row, Hagerstown, MD, 1977.
- U Hoppu and others. Breast milk - immunomodulatory
signals against allergic diseases. Allergy. April 2001;56 suppl
67:23-6.
- M G Enig. Trans Fatty Acids in the Food Supply:
A Comprehensive Report Covering 60 Years of Research, 2nd Edition,
Enig Associates, Inc, Silver Spring, MD, 1995.
- Kenneth D R Setchell and others. Exposure of infants
to phyto-oestrogens from soy-based infant formula. The Lancet.
July 5, 1997;350:23-27.
- P Vadas and others. Detection of peanut allergens
in breast milk of lactating women. Journal of the American Medical
Association. April 4, 2001;285(13):1746-8.
- N Baumslag and D L Michels. Milk, Money and
Madness: The Culture and Politics of Breastfeeding. Bergin & Garvey,
Westport, CT, 1995.
- M G Rowland and A A Paul. Factors affecting lactation
capacity: implications for developing countries. Infant and Child
Feeding. J T Bond and others, eds. Academic Press, New York, 1981.
- N Baumslag and D L Michels. Milk, Money and
Madness: The Culture and Politics of Breastfeeding.Bergin & Garvey,
Westport, CT, 1995.
- W A Price. Nutrition and Physical Degeneration.
Price-Pottenger Nutrition Foundation, San Deigo, CA, 1945
- N Baumslag and D L Michels. Milk, Money and
Madness: The Culture and Politics of Breastfeeding.Bergin & Garvey,
Westport, CT, 1995.
- M Kaufmann. What's In Infant Formula? Washington
Post Health. June 1, 1999, p 14.
- B B Teter and others. Milk Fat Depression in C57B1/6J
Mice Consuming Partially Hydrogenated Fat. Journal of Nutrition.
1990;120:818-824.
- W A Price. Vitamins in Immunity and Growth. Journal
of the American Dental Association. May 1930. Click
here to read an excerpt.
- F T Proudfit. Nutrition and Diet Therapy.
Eighth Edition. The MacMillan Company, New York, 1942, p 259.
SIDEBAR ARTICLES
DIET FOR PREGNANT WOMEN AND NURSING MOTHERS
Cod liver oil to supply 10,000-20,000 IU vitamin A daily
2 8-ounce glasses whole milk daily, preferably raw and from pasture-fed
cows
4 tablespoons butter daily, preferably from pasture-fed cows
2 or more eggs daily, preferably from pastured chickens
Additional egg yolks daily, added to smoothies, salad dressings, scrambled
eggs, etc.
3-4 ounces fresh liver, once or twice per week
Fresh seafood, 2-4 times per week, particularly wild salmon, shellfish
and fish eggs
Fresh beef or lamb daily, always consumed with the fat
Oily fish or lard daily, for vitamin D
2 tablespoons coconut oil daily, used in cooking or smoothies, etc.
Lacto-fermented condiments and beverages
Bone broths used in soups, stews and sauces
Soaked whole grains
Fresh vegetables and fruits
AVOID: Trans fatty acids, junk foods, commercial fried foods,
sugar, white flour, soft drinks, caffeine, alcohol, cigarettes and drugs
(even prescription drugs).
MYTHS AND TRUTHS ABOUT BREASTFEEDING
MYTH: Every woman can breastfeed successfully.
TRUTH: Even in traditional societies, a portion of the women did not
have adequate milk supply. When a wet nurse was unavailable, babies
of mothers with inadequate milk supply were given milk of cows, goats,
sheep, water buffalo, camels, reindeer or llamas.
MYTH: Most diets provide adequate nutrition for nursing mothers. There
is no need for nursing women to add special foods to their diets.
TRUTH: Human milk will be lacking in vitamins A, D, B12 and
other fat soluble vitamin if the mother's diet is poor. Human milk will
also lack long-chain fatty acids if these are not present in adequate
amounts in the mother's diet. In addition, mothers on calorie-restricted
diets will have lower levels of fat and lactose in their milk. Weston
Price found that in traditional societies, women continued to consume
special foods during the lactation period.
MYTH: Breastfeeding can prevent dental problems such as crowded teeth,
underdeveloped jaw, etc.
TRUTH: The development of the face and jaw depends on the nutrients
available to the child from preconception through childhood. Breastfed
children can have dental deformities if their nutrition in the womb
and the breast milk they received were lacking in nutrients.
TIPS FOR SUCCESSFUL BREASTFEEDING
Follow the Diet for Pregnant Women and Nursing Mothers), ideally from
before conception. Eat plenty of food. When you are breastfeeding, it
is no time to diet!
Try to arrange to have good help for the first four weeks after the
baby is born so that you will have adequate rest. Husband, grandparents,
relatives, friends, housekeepers or even a professional baby nurse should
be on hand so that the nursing mother can concentrate on getting optimal
nourishment and plenty of sleep.
Fermented foods and beverages, and porridges of soaked grains, are
said to increase milk supply.
If you have any qualms or fears about not having enough milk, assemble
the ingredients for homemade formula, and purchase the Lact-Aid breastfeeding
support system so that you have what you need to provide a nourishing
supplement, if that is required. Sometimes just a few days of supplementing
using the Lact-Aid can increase milk flow, and just having the supplies
on hand can be enough to give you the peace of mind that allows your
milk to keep flowing. While you are pregnant, be sure to scout out the
best quality milk available in your area-you will need this for yourself,
and for the baby after weaning, even if the breastfeeding goes well.
If, in spite of these measures, your milk supply dries up, don't feel
guilty. You have done the best you could and your baby can still grow
up healthy, strong and smart on a homemade, whole foods baby formula.
WHEN BREASTFEEDING MAY NOT BE BEST
GALACTOSEMIA: This is a rare genetic disorder in which the infant cannot
digest galactose. The child will die if it is breastfed.
VEGANISM: The milk of vegan mothers will be lacking in vitamin B12
and important long-chain fatty acids. If a vegan mother insists on breastfeeding,
her baby's diet should be supplemented with cod liver oil, egg yolks
and liver, all animal foods.
JUNK FOOD DIET: Junk foods full of trans fatty acids will reduce
the fat content of mothers' milk and cause trans fatty acids
to be present in mothers' milk. Homemade whole food baby formula will
be more nutritious than the milk of mothers on a junk food diet.
INSUFFICIENT MILK SUPPLY: This is uncommon, but not as rare as is indicated
in the medical literature. A supplemental homemade formula should be
given using the Lact-Aid breastfeeding aid (www.lact-aid.com).
ADOPTED BABIES: It has been reported that breast milk has been stimulated
in non-biologic mothers, but this is rare. Adopted babies should be
given homemade baby formula.
WHEN BREASTFEEDING IS FINE,
IN SPITE OF WHAT THE DOCTORS SAY
PHENYLKETONURIA: This is a rare genetic disorder in which the infant
must avoid phenylalanine, an amino acid. With careful medical supervision,
these children have been successfully breastfed in combination with
a phenylalanine-free protein substitute.
HIV POSITIVE: Mothers who test HIV positive are told not to breastfeed.
But a South African study found that the HIV virus is not passed to
breastfeeding infants when the mother's diet contains sufficient vitamin
A Other studies have found that a low viral load also prevents transmission
from mother to child.
DIABETES: Although diabetic mothers are often warned not to breastfeed,
breastfeeding actually diminishes complications in the infants of diabetic
mothers. Once again, adequate maternal nutrition is vital.
LA LECHE LEAGUE
Founded in 1956, La Leche League is considered the world's foremost
authority on breastfeeding. The organization offers information and
support in sixty countries around the world for mothers who choose to
breastfeed their babies. They have lobbied for the rights of mothers
to nurse on the job and in public places, and they conduct support groups
for nursing mothers of all income levels.
No one can dispute the service that La Leche League has performed in
raising awareness of the benefits of breastfeeding. However, the organization
is also the most influential proponent of the fallacy that "all mothers
can nurse successfully." Furthermore, they have down-played the influence
of diet on the quality of mothers' milk. In fact, their literature denies
the role of human milk fat in the development of the nervous system.
The organization has also failed to use their influence to warn mothers
about factors that can compromise the quality of their milk. When Dr.
Bev Teter discovered that dietary trans fatty acids can lower the fat
content of mothers' milk, she immediately contacted La Leche League
so that they could warn all nursing mothers to avoid them. La Leche
League did not respond, perhaps because they did not understand the
role of fats in the development of the infant. They also ignored the
input of another concerned scientist, that mercury from amalgam fillings
can cause high levels of mercury in human milk.
<Back
| Home | Tour
| Calendar | Contact
Us | Funding | Join
Now
|